|
Bell
SkunkWorks
101
A Look Behind the Curtain.
Connect the Dots or be One of the
Disconnected.
In order to get rid of competitors
such as MCI, Verizon hired IDI to create a fake rally,
got the Gray Panthers to run adds, and even got the Church
of Christ involved. In another case, TRAC created a new
coalition to back the Bell company broadband plans which
included the Gray Panthers, American
Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD), Black
Leadership Forum, and League of United Latin American
Citizens (LULAC) -- all backed by the Bell companies.
Harm To Competitors
101
- "Gray
Panther Ads Targeting WorldCom Funded by IDI
Corporate Crime
Reporter, 6/2/03 Earlier this month, the Gray Panthers, a
public interest group that defends the rights of senior
citizens, took out full page ads in newspapers around the
country calling on federal officials to stop awarding
federal contracts to MCI WorldCom -- which committed one
of the largest corporate frauds in history. At the bottom
of the ads, in small type, is this :"This ad was paid for
by Gray Panthers."
"In fact, the $200,000 spent by the
Gray Panthers to place the newspaper ads was raised by
Issue Dynamics Inc., a Washington, D.C.-based consulting
firm that represents the Baby Bells in their fight
against WorldCom and that specializes in "bridging gaps
between industry and consumer groups on public policy
issues."
- WorldCom
Opponents In Sync D.C. Firm Helps Organize Protest,
Washington Post,
6/30/03 Verizon spokesman Eric Rabe confirmed that IDI is
working for the telephone company. "We are happy to
support groups that have similar views as ours, and Sam
is bringing us together," Rabe said. "...Rabe would not
say how much Verizon is paying IDI. He said Verizon is
not the only company contributing to a "funding pool" on
the WorldCom issue, but he declined to identify other
participants."
According to the Washington
Post,
- "
last year IDI organized an
effort by the National Association of the Deaf, the
American Foundation for the Blind and the American
Association of People With Disabilities to support a bill
pushed by the local telephone companies to relax rules
that require them to share their high-speed networks with
rivals. In a news release issued by IDI, the groups said
they would benefit because the bill would increase access
to broadband for everyone, including those with
disabilities."
- "United
Church of Christ Stooge for the Baby
Bells?
UCCtruths.com
- Gloria Tristani, managing
director of the Office of Communication of the United
Church of Christ (OC, Inc.) and former Commissioner of
the FCC.
- Source
Watch: Issue Dynamics
"...its work has angered some consumer activists, who
say IDI often does not disclose whom it is working for
and argue that IDI's work amounts to astroturf
PR."
- Gray
Panthers' Corporate
Connection, 6/25/03,
CommonDreams.org
- "Over the past couple of years,
Issue Dynamics played a pivotal role in turning the
National Consumers League from a consumer group into a
corporate front group. And last year, Sam Simon, Issue
Dynamics' founder and president, was named chair of the
board of the National Consumers League."
Sam Takes the
Consumer Groups to Fight For Bell Broadband.
What do all of these groups have
in common?
- Gray Panthers
- American Association of People
with Disabilities (AAPD)
- Black Leadership
Forum
- League of United Latin American
Citizens (LULAC)
This group jointly signed an ex parte
letter to the FCC that says --- the Bell companies shouldn't
have to open their fiber-optic networks to competition. Why
is it important for these groups to support the Bell
companies and why would they care? Well, work by Ionary
Consulting revealed that these groups got large donations
from Verizon:
- $50,000 to the Black Leadership
Forum
- $205,500 to LULAC
- AAPD got "major" donations
from both Verizon and the Verizon Foundation, and put a
Verizon VP on its own board.
Is it any wonder that these groups met
with Commissioner Martin and Commission Abernathy at the
FCC? Here's letters disclosing that they met with
commissioners and staff, as well as presenting a summary
about policies the FCC should follow about
broadband.
What was probably not mentioned
anywhere is that these groups most likely did
NOT disclose that they were funded by the phone
companies, even though they were dressed as consumer groups,
representing blacks, seniors, Hispanics, and people with
disabilities.
|